Too often today, the protection of markets is presented as a “protectionist” tool, a sign of economic weakness that discourages exports, leads to less efficient producers and favours the “corporatist” interests of the agricultural profession to the detriment of poor consumers.
In fact, half of the world’s population lives from family farming and experiences the full impact of the continued opening of agricultural markets. In its prior report, “Agriculture: for World Trade Regulations”, published in December 2005, the Agriculture and Food Committee of
Faced with the negative effects of excessive liberalization, an increasing number of developing countries try to preserve a room for manoeuvre in order to protect their agricultural development, in particular in the context of World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations.
Their proposals, whether related to the identification of “special products” protected from liberalization or specific safeguard measures providing temporary protection, have met significant resistance and many objections from major agro-exporting countries, whether in the West or developing regions. The current suspension of WTO negotiations has created a fear of a protectionist trade barrier. However, in reality, it has not lessened the pressure to open agricultural markets: this pressure is even greater in the context of bilateral and regional free trade agreements. Current negotiations of the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPA) between the European Union (EU) and African,
Paradoxically, liberal dogma is being increasingly questioned or, at least, nuanced in inter
national debates on development policies. To quote one recent example, the last report of UNCTAD (1) highlights the need for protection of economic development, supported by public investment. “Each country, according to its level of development, is responsible for protecting sectors deemed important and easing customs protection once national companies become competitive. The phased opening of markets is key to progressive development.” (2)
For this reason,
Our work is based on the daily experience of social movements and NGOs in developing countries with whom we work and seeks to shed light on often forgotten truths: development is based on a variety of policies, none of which works in all countries, for all products and at all times. In particular in agriculture, a qualified and diversified approach is required to meet the realities of each country. A variety of public policy tools is therefore crucial, one of which must be market protection.
1 UNCTAD (2006), Report on Trade and Development.
2 Christian Losson, “In UNCTAD’s view, the South needs state stimulation”, interview with Detlef Kotte, Globalization and Development Strategy Manager for UNCTAD, “Libération”, 1 September 2006.
Coordination SUD : Actualités
Le FIP au FSM : Atelier sur la régulation des marchés agricoles en es ptDocument DNG
La charte de l’exercice "Régulation des marchés agricoles" en es pt© 2010 ONG-NGO - Netlinking - Réalisation : MWM